On the streets of NY: What did you like Foster? | Arhitektura.Bg
News Headlines Urban Residential buildings Public buildings density of air Interior Interviews Links Golf Courses Gates Architecture Urban Gates CG-line density of air magazine Foreign architects Blog Freelancers BG Studios Projects Product
My visit to New York, some time ago, it was very beneficial for my eye on how things are with the design / implementation of unique buildings and that is likely a building to look one way photo / visualization, and different - live. Often, looking at a new project, one does not realize how it would look built "from the scene." density of air The reason is simple - to be the audience in carefully arranged forged and chewed appearance, just ready to be swallowed.
Well, it is clear that reading my post will not see the building live, but we can see it in the framework of amateur photographs. From inappropriate glances addressed so that the object can be seen not only from the "shiny" side.
The first thing that comes to my mind, looking at the tower is: achieve a perfect balance between heavy, impressive structure and fine ratio width / height. density of air And immediately after that - how little detail has received absolutely sufficient building; not have to be complicated, as long as it is against the other nadrebneni skyscrapers. Finally density of air - a combination of new and old. New high-tech building has nothing to do with the existing base perched density of air on it, without any claim to respect. Yes, but the contrast is kind of consideration / communication - here this is the case.
But what happens when you face this giant? The effect of lubrication (which it almost everywhere in Manhattan) is even increased due to the construction. The skyscraper is not looking so slim, even I would say that is a bit clumsy.
For the insane scale contributes not only heavy construction, but it is precisely this lack of detail, which aims "simplicity." The screen of glass is definitely not enough to feel human in proportion.
And not to mention the contrast. True is true - the contrast is profitable technique in many places, but not here. In my new glassware stands absolutely artificial, even if it does not like the cut in the building of MAKE.
For you do not know, but my personal opinion is that the new Foster environmentally sustainable design and human scale is much better (although not as impressive) than the previous density of air - seeking at all costs to make something new, different, sickening.
This posting was posted on Friday, May 29th, 2009 at 10:00 in grades architecture, Find ten differences around the world, the streets of New York, Glass. You can follow any responses to this entry through density of air the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or tracking URL from your own site. 15 Responses to "On the streets of NY: What its like Foster?"
I personally hand on heart admit frankly do not like Norman Foster. Hearst Headquarters building also would not like to comment on in terms of its architectural qualities. Yes, the scale is wrong, yes, sought contrast to 6-story art-deco "basis" is not achieved, the building is almost entirely glass and still "weigh" ... But there is another point of view. Norman Foster is one of the pioneers in the introduction of steel structures density of air in architecture and as such may not be perfect from the start. He himself learned from the experience, and many others learn from it. There are other similar examples-building Centre Pompidou by Richard Rogers and Renzo Piano in itself is not impressive architecture, but marks the beginning of the high-flow and this fact makes it sufficiently valuable from an architectural point of view, to be able to afford be as you would an ugly ... This is of course an exaggeration;) density of air What Sir Norman Foster deserves the deepest respect and admiration, is its ability to change and rethink his philosophy. Unfortunately, many other architects, including such world-class, do not have this ability. Recent projects show precisely Foster a rethinking and siphoning of constructiveness to the nature of megalomania to human scale. And here he can not be perfect from the outset, but the courage of such a radical philosophical change is impressive.
I was also left with a good impression of this building project, but alas, as I mentioned density of air in another topic someone should ban "art vizualizatsiyte" - very pleasant but cool lie mazhat.V this CASE main difference in scale in idv that this viz.a Yanko seated and Parwan komozitsiyka with luminous windows to diversify the building - in reality can not happen tova.Inache in that building did not "old Foster" and is exactly the same as the one where he makes " eco-cities "- Deme
News Headlines Urban Residential buildings Public buildings density of air Interior Interviews Links Golf Courses Gates Architecture Urban Gates CG-line density of air magazine Foreign architects Blog Freelancers BG Studios Projects Product
My visit to New York, some time ago, it was very beneficial for my eye on how things are with the design / implementation of unique buildings and that is likely a building to look one way photo / visualization, and different - live. Often, looking at a new project, one does not realize how it would look built "from the scene." density of air The reason is simple - to be the audience in carefully arranged forged and chewed appearance, just ready to be swallowed.
Well, it is clear that reading my post will not see the building live, but we can see it in the framework of amateur photographs. From inappropriate glances addressed so that the object can be seen not only from the "shiny" side.
The first thing that comes to my mind, looking at the tower is: achieve a perfect balance between heavy, impressive structure and fine ratio width / height. density of air And immediately after that - how little detail has received absolutely sufficient building; not have to be complicated, as long as it is against the other nadrebneni skyscrapers. Finally density of air - a combination of new and old. New high-tech building has nothing to do with the existing base perched density of air on it, without any claim to respect. Yes, but the contrast is kind of consideration / communication - here this is the case.
But what happens when you face this giant? The effect of lubrication (which it almost everywhere in Manhattan) is even increased due to the construction. The skyscraper is not looking so slim, even I would say that is a bit clumsy.
For the insane scale contributes not only heavy construction, but it is precisely this lack of detail, which aims "simplicity." The screen of glass is definitely not enough to feel human in proportion.
And not to mention the contrast. True is true - the contrast is profitable technique in many places, but not here. In my new glassware stands absolutely artificial, even if it does not like the cut in the building of MAKE.
For you do not know, but my personal opinion is that the new Foster environmentally sustainable design and human scale is much better (although not as impressive) than the previous density of air - seeking at all costs to make something new, different, sickening.
This posting was posted on Friday, May 29th, 2009 at 10:00 in grades architecture, Find ten differences around the world, the streets of New York, Glass. You can follow any responses to this entry through density of air the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or tracking URL from your own site. 15 Responses to "On the streets of NY: What its like Foster?"
I personally hand on heart admit frankly do not like Norman Foster. Hearst Headquarters building also would not like to comment on in terms of its architectural qualities. Yes, the scale is wrong, yes, sought contrast to 6-story art-deco "basis" is not achieved, the building is almost entirely glass and still "weigh" ... But there is another point of view. Norman Foster is one of the pioneers in the introduction of steel structures density of air in architecture and as such may not be perfect from the start. He himself learned from the experience, and many others learn from it. There are other similar examples-building Centre Pompidou by Richard Rogers and Renzo Piano in itself is not impressive architecture, but marks the beginning of the high-flow and this fact makes it sufficiently valuable from an architectural point of view, to be able to afford be as you would an ugly ... This is of course an exaggeration;) density of air What Sir Norman Foster deserves the deepest respect and admiration, is its ability to change and rethink his philosophy. Unfortunately, many other architects, including such world-class, do not have this ability. Recent projects show precisely Foster a rethinking and siphoning of constructiveness to the nature of megalomania to human scale. And here he can not be perfect from the outset, but the courage of such a radical philosophical change is impressive.
I was also left with a good impression of this building project, but alas, as I mentioned density of air in another topic someone should ban "art vizualizatsiyte" - very pleasant but cool lie mazhat.V this CASE main difference in scale in idv that this viz.a Yanko seated and Parwan komozitsiyka with luminous windows to diversify the building - in reality can not happen tova.Inache in that building did not "old Foster" and is exactly the same as the one where he makes " eco-cities "- Deme
No comments:
Post a Comment